Current:Home > MyAlito extends order barring Texas from detaining migrants under SB4 immigration law for now -ProfitEdge
Alito extends order barring Texas from detaining migrants under SB4 immigration law for now
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:11:27
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito on Monday extended an order barring Texas officials from detaining and jailing migrants suspected of crossing the U.S. southern border without authorization under a new state immigration law known as SB4 that the Biden administration has called unconstitutional.
Minutes after a self-imposed deadline passed, Alito issued an order continuing to pause enforcement of the controversial Texas law, one of Gov. Greg Abbott's signature immigration policies, on an administrative basis.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit is considering the measure's legality, and the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to put the law on hold as the court challenge plays out. The full court has not yet acted on that request.
Passed by the Texas legislature last year, SB4 criminalizes unauthorized migration at the state level, making the act of entering the U.S. outside of a port of entry — already a federal offense — into a state crime. It also creates a felony charge for illegal reentry at the state level.
At the request of the Biden administration, a federal judge last month blocked SB4, finding that the state measure is at odds with federal immigration laws. That ruling was then suspended by the 5th Circuit until Alito paused the appeals court's order on administrative grounds. Alito's administrative stay maintains the status quo while the court considers the Justice Department's request for emergency relief.
SB4 empowers Texas law enforcement officials, at the state and local levels, to stop, jail and prosecute migrants on illegal entry and reentry charges. It also allows Texas judges to order migrants to return to Mexico as an alternative to continuing their prosecution, effectively creating a de facto state deportation system.
The Justice Department has said SB4 conflicts with federal law and the Constitution, noting that immigration enforcement, including arrests and deportations, have long been a federal responsibility. It has also argued the measure harms relations with the Mexican government, which has denounced SB4 as "anti-immigrant" and vowed to reject migrants returned by the state of Texas.
Abbott, who has positioned himself as the leading state critic of President Biden's border policies, has portrayed SB4 as a necessary measure to discourage migrants from crossing the Rio Grande, arguing the federal government has not done enough to deter illegal immigration.
Over the past three years, Texas has mounted the most aggressive state effort yet to challenge the federal government's power over immigration policy, busing tens of thousands of migrants to major, Democratic-led cities, assembling razor wire and buoys along stretches of the border to deter migrant crossings and filing multiple lawsuits against federal immigration programs.
Camilo Montoya-GalvezCamilo Montoya-Galvez is the immigration reporter at CBS News. Based in Washington, he covers immigration policy and politics.
TwitterveryGood! (49425)
Related
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Man with weapons and Jan. 6 warrant arrested after running toward Obamas' D.C. home
- Illinois Passes Tougher Rules on Toxic Coal Ash Over Risks to Health and Rivers
- House Votes to Block Trump from Using Clean Energy Funds to Back Fossil Fuels Project
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- A German Initiative Seeks to Curb Global Emissions of a Climate Super-Pollutant
- Taylor Swift and Matty Healy Break Up After Whirlwind Romance
- Experts Divided Over Safety of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- In Remote Town in Mali, Africa’s Climate Change Future is Now
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
- Bling Empire Stars Pay Tribute to “Mesmerizing” Anna Shay Following Her Death
- Can Massachusetts Democrats Overcome the Power of Business Lobbyists and Pass Climate Legislation?
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Shop Beard Daddy Conditioning Spray, Father’s Day Gift of the Year
- Huge Western Fires in 1910 Changed US Wildfire Policy. Will Today’s Conflagrations Do the Same?
- Big Banks Make a Dangerous Bet on the World’s Growing Demand for Food
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
WHO questions safety of aspartame. Here's a list of popular foods, beverages with the sweetener.
More Than 100 Cities Worldwide Now Powered Primarily by Renewable Energy
Peter Thomas Roth Flash Deal: Get $260 Worth of Retinol for $89 and Reduce Wrinkles Overnight
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
You'll Love Ariana Grande Harder for Trolling Her Own Makeup Look
The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
EPA Plans to Rewrite Clean Water Act Rules to Fast-Track Pipelines